The 1930s and the Perils of a Failed Europe

Eric Medlin
3 min readOct 12, 2022

Europe must be functional for Ukraine to survive.

Léon Blum, a French prime minister of the 1930s. Source: Wikipedia

The war between Russia and Ukraine has escalated once again in recent days. On October 8, Ukraine blew up the only vehicular and rail transit bridge into Crimea from Russia. Russia responded by firing missiles into the Ukrainian capital. The back-and-forth threatens to increase civilian casualties while also reflecting Russia’s increasingly untenable position in the conflict. Vladimir Putin’s partial mobilization has done little to turn the tide. He has resorted to nuclear threats and sham annexations, but there seems to be little expectation that these are more than bluffs and saber-rattling.

Observers believe that these developments point to an eventual Ukrainian success. The Russian government seems unlikely to be able to launch a full mobilization of its people, given their vehement opposition to a partial draft. Every takeover of Ukrainian land is soon repulsed by the Ukrainian army. Russia has had to resort to buying ammunition from North Korea, and there is always the chance of an end to its vital relationship with China. In short, Russia does not seem to have a clear path to victory in this protracted conflict.

But these disadvantages for Russia are complicated by the caveat of Russia’s size and massive army. Russia may not be performing well in the war so far…

--

--

Eric Medlin

I’m a writer interested in the intersections of history, ideas, and politics. I publish every week. www.twitter.com/medlinwrites